Algorithmic Bias: The Invisible Injustice

Punched card for input in FIRST generation of Computer, it reflects how algorithm, the human-decision making procedure collects and processes data.
Resource: https://www.flickr.com/photos/binaryape/5151286161/

Algorithm is not a new term in Internet age. It is a set of instructions to solve problems and was first published in 1843. However, algorithm is now heavily applied to the Internet construction to predict what users want.

The first time I realize the exist of algorithm is when I browse my Instagram feed, the similar product I’ve searched before always pop up. At beginning, I think such highly customized ads are very user-friendly. But then it annoys me and makes me feel my privacy has been violated: my preferences and data are being shared by different platforms. Such advertisements always encourage me to purchase products and trying to get money from my pocket (but I have to admit that my ability of self-control is not strong enough).

This is not the worst. When I am overwhelmed by the promotion posts, my cousin says he doesn’t have such troubles. His Instagram feed is not that consumerized.

My Instagram feed
My cousin’s Instagram feed

On the social media platform, women are usually targeting as consumer group. The marketing strategy is doing the best to make women pay the real money. There are practical reasons behind this phenomenon: according to statistics, the purchasing power of women is significantly higher than men. Obviously, the algorithm has mastered this law.

Statistics on the purchasing power of women
Resource: https://girlpowermarketing.com/statistics-purchasing-power-women/

In addition to this, many of my female friends, including myself, have received this kind of message on Instagram:

Fake ambassador opportunity

It is a new-type scam on social media. Luring young girls on Instagram become brand ambassadors and ask them pay for “free” jewelries. The senders are mostly robot account and run by program. In this case, the algorithm again chooses to target female.

What really makes me uncomfortable is, everything happens here are too invisible. We think that the program has no bias, but forget that people who wrote them has it. In Safiya Umoja Noble’s book, she uses Google search engine to illustrate how algorithm has bias on colored female: when she type keywords “black girls” into searching box, the first page of results is filled with porn. Such discrimination is not inherent in search engines, but a projection of society. When we think that we have entered a brand new and civilized Internet age, no, the history just repeats itself on the new platform. And with the cover of digital screen, all this happened naturally, because we don’t see a real discriminator in front of us.

This invisible injustice has penetrated into social media. Another phenomenon I notice is that many high-liked videos on short video platforms always cater to male gaze.

What would algorithm do here is, when you liked these videos, there will be more and more similar videos occur in your feed. And creators will continue to produce such content in order to gain more likes. Although algorithmic recommendation brings highly personalized feed to users, it has generated a vicious circle on platforms and reinforce the prejudices of society in an invisible way.

The point here is we should realize that new technology is not non-bias. As a product of human and society, algorithm is inevitably containing the domain ideology. It is crucial to aware of this fact and be critical to what we have seen on our feed. I’d like to use a quotation from George Orwell’s renowned book 1984 as the end of this reflection:

Who controls the past controls the future.

Who controls the present controls the past.

George Orwell

SK-II #BareSkinProject: What is Under the Bare Skin?

In recent years, cosmetics and skincare brand seem to be increasingly focusing on integrating customers’ concerning topic into marketing. Meanwhile, more and more consumers begun to take service experience and value recognition into account when choosing the brands. As for most female consumers, the one that impresses most is often related to women’s inner world and female power. It is worth mentioning that the skincare brand SK-II has taken many bold attempts in this field and received lots of positive feedbacks. I’d like to use their recent campaign #BareSkinProject to analyze their marketing strategies and how did this interact with Sheconomy.


What is Sheconomy?
Sheconomy emerged around 2010, along with the improvement of women’s social status and economic strength, suggested by Morgan Stanley Research. Different from the pink economy, which targeting a certain group as major consumption power, Sheconomy more concerns about female’s living conditions and reflects on marketing strategies. As a consumer myself, I would be more touched when I see a brand really care about women’s dilemma in their campaign, rather than simply use pink appearance to draw our attentions.  

#BareSkinProject
In this project, SK-II invited six actresses to take a bold try by revealing their bare skin to the public.

Arimura Kasumi, Chloë Moretz, Mayu
Tang Wei, Ni Ni, Chun Xia
#BareSkinProject Chun Xia reveals her Bare Skin with SK II Facial Treatment Essence
#BareSkinProject Chloe Moretz reveals her Bare Skin with SK II Facial Treatment

In this set of photography, all these six actresses didn’t use foundation on the skin, and the only ally was SK-II Facial Treatment Essence. As the photo and video above shows, although Chloe expressed many concerns before shooting, she was quite satisfied with the healthy and natural looking in the end.

As a commercial promotion, I personally think it was very successful. The starting point of this campaign was to show the effect of the Facial Treatment Essence, and what could be more convincing than the bare skin? Especially when it comes to celebrities, people have a natural curiosity for those stunning stars, which brings more attention to this campaign.

Alongside this, the call for natural beauty of women is also a currently debating. On Douyin, there is a challenge called #RejectAppearanceAnxiety, in which girls put their original and filtered photos together. This challenge page racked up over a billion views, which is enough to show how female are paying attention to appearance anxiety. And #BareSkinProject is just calling people to stop anxiety.

#RejectApperanceAnxiety

What is under the Bare Skin?
Back to the question in title: what is under the bare skin? For this campaign, we can say it starts with a well-meaning point, it encourages female to face the true self. However, when we see those celebrities still looking gorgeous with bare skin, will this arouse a new kind of anxiety? The truth that the photography didn’t reveal is that behind their perfect bare skin, there are high spending on skincare and professional lighting from world-renowned photographer.

As a brand campaign, #BareSkinProject inevitably has commercial attributes and ultimately serves the interest of SK-II. The core of #BareSkinProject is not to encourage women to have no makeup and pursue natural beauty. It is used to reflect the effect of product. However, this campaign releases more implicit meaning during the process of dissemination. However, this campaign releases more implicit meaning during the process of dissemination. It breaks the stereotype of beauty and brings up a new definition of feminine beauty. My point here is we should treat the commercial campaign critically, to see what is truly under the bare skin.